Visit our Christmas Gift Finder
Click & Collect from 2 Hours*
Last Christmas delivery dates
Free UK Standard Delivery On all orders £20 and over Order in time for Christmas 19th December 2nd Class | 20th December 1st Class Free Click & Collect to UK shops From 2 hours of your order*
Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective (Paperback)
  • Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective (Paperback)
zoom

Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico's Democratization in Comparative Perspective (Paperback)

(author)
£26.99
Paperback 368 Pages / Published: 31/07/2009
  • We can order this

Usually dispatched within 3 weeks

  • This item has been added to your basket
Why have dominant parties persisted in power for decades in countries spread across the globe? Why did most eventually lose? Why Dominant Parties Lose develops a theory of single-party dominance, its durability, and its breakdown into fully competitive democracy. Greene shows that dominant parties turn public resources into patronage goods to bias electoral competition in their favor and virtually win elections before election day without resorting to electoral fraud or bone-crushing repression. Opposition parties fail because their resource disadvantages force them to form as niche parties with appeals that are out of step with the average voter. When the political economy of dominance erodes, the partisan playing field becomes fairer and opposition parties can expand into catchall competitors that threaten the dominant party at the polls. Greene uses this argument to show why Mexico transformed from a dominant party authoritarian regime under PRI rule to a fully competitive democracy.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 9780521139892
Number of pages: 368
Weight: 540 g
Dimensions: 226 x 152 x 28 mm


MEDIA REVIEWS
"In this scholarly tour de force, Greene combines original formal models and other careful methods in developing a novel and persuasive argument for the longevity and decline of dominant parties. This book contributes significantly to our understanding of Mexican politics, the comparative study of competitive authoritarian regimes, and party formation." -Jorge I. Dominguez, Harvard University
"Kenneth Greene's book contributes major insights to the comparative study of dominant party regimes, whether in an authoritarian or a democratic regime context, by showing why political activists cannot easily form a credible challenger to the incumbent party and linking this to political economic institutions and performance." -Herbert Kitschelt, Duke University
"Kenneth Greene has produced an excellent and important contribution to the literature on the persistence and decline of dominant party systems in general, and on the Mexican case in particular. His resource theory of single-party dominance is married to an innovative model of the political behavior of party elites to show how the incumbent's patronage advantages make opposition parties undercompetitive. This well-argued and evidenced study will be of interest not only to Latin Americanists, but also to scholars of party system development more broadly." -Marcus J. Kurtz, Ohio State University
"Why Dominant Parties Lose asks great questions about how some political parties become dominant and why they cease being dominant after an extended period of time. Greene answers these questions in a creative and skillful manner, with theoretical insight and empirical rigor. Based on many years of careful research, the book fruitfully illuminates the Mexican case and effectively places it in a broader theoretical framework." -Scott Mainwaring, Kellogg Institute for International Studies
"Kenneth F. Greene [...]make['s] important, original contributions to this debate and to the broader analysis of political parties, elections and democratization. [...]Greene provides an important insight into the internal dynamics of opposition parties and the challenges they confront in dominant-party systems." -Kevin J. Middlebrook, University of London, Perspectives on Politics
"...this is a scholarly tour de force in its formal models, applied statistical work, qualitative case studies, and vision of party formation and regime transition." Jorge I. Dominguez, Harvard University, Political Science Quarterly
"In this fascinating study, Kenneth F. Greene identifies the factors that perpetuated 'dominant party authoritarian regimes' (DPARs) in Mexico and other nations, such as Taiwan and Malaysia, despite the existence of competitive electoral systems...Greene has forged a unified and compelling theory that explains much of Mexican political history from 1929 to the present. Why Dominant Parties Lose will undoubtedly set the parameters for future debates on the nature of the Mexican political system and inform broader comparative discussions on party system formation." Adrian A. Bantjes, University of Wyoming, Laramie, Comparative Political Studies
"Greene offers an important, well-written book that attempts to explain why dominant political parties are able to sustain their predominance and why those same parties eventually lose power...While focusing on Mexico's party system, he nevertheless addresses other dominant party systems, giving the analysis greater generalizability and broader appeal. This book opens a window into a neglected area in the democratization literature--dominant party authoritarian regimes. The book also makes a strong contribution to the general literature on political parties. Summing Up: Highly recommended." P. M. Sanchez, Loyola University Chicago, Choice
"Why Dominant Parties Lose is a well crafted book that contributes significantly to the literature on Mexican politics, party systems, political transition and comparative political regimes... He develops a sophisticated theory of single-party dominance and opposition party development that features formal modeling, quantitative analysis, and qualitative fieldwork... In sum, this is a great book, featuring an extensive review of the vast literature in the field, great mastery of the theoretical and methodological tools available in the discipline, a carefully argued case for the author's significant contribution, all of which delivered in self-possessed and dispassionate prose." Yvon Grenier, St. Francis Xavier University, Canadian Journal of Political Science

You may also be interested in...

The Logic of Violence in Civil War
Added to basket
Why States Recover
Added to basket
£20.00
Paperback
Wars, Guns and Votes
Added to basket
Understanding Russian Politics
Added to basket
The Origins of Political Order
Added to basket
Patterns of Democracy
Added to basket
The Politics of Belgium
Added to basket
The Body Economic
Added to basket
Political Order and Political Decay
Added to basket
Foreign Policy Analysis
Added to basket
Democracy
Added to basket
£19.99
Paperback
Putin's Oil
Added to basket
£20.00
Hardback
Polarizing Development
Added to basket

Please sign in to write a review

Your review has been submitted successfully.