• Sign In
  • Help
  • My Basket0
Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics (Paperback)
  • Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics (Paperback)

Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics (Paperback)

(author), (author)
Paperback 228 Pages / Published: 29/03/2007
  • We can order this

Usually despatched within 3 weeks

  • This item has been added to your basket

Check Marketplace availability

Informed consent is a central topic in contemporary biomedical ethics. Yet attempts to set defensible and feasible standards for consenting have led to persistent difficulties. In Rethinking Informed Consent in Bioethics, first published in 2007, Neil Manson and Onora O'Neill set debates about informed consent in medicine and research in a fresh light. They show why informed consent cannot be fully specific or fully explicit, and why more specific consent is not always ethically better. They argue that consent needs distinctive communicative transactions, by which other obligations, prohibitions, and rights can be waived or set aside in controlled and specific ways. Their book offers a coherent, wide-ranging and practical account of the role of consent in biomedicine which will be valuable to readers working in a range of areas in bioethics, medicine and law.

Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISBN: 9780521697477
Number of pages: 228
Weight: 370 g
Dimensions: 228 x 152 x 14 mm

'In this important book, Manson and O'Neill propose a new way of thinking about informed consent - one emphasising the importance of norms appropriate for successful communication such as intelligibility, relevance, accuracy and honesty. This is a significant, timely and internationally relevant contribution to the bioethics literature. It should be essential reading for anyone interested in the ethics of medical research and treatment and in particular for anyone involved in the development of ethics policy.' Michael Parker, Professor of Bioethics and Director of The Ethox Centre, University of Oxford
'This is a ground-breaking book. The idea that information is dynamic, that what, in this genetic age, even comprises information, receives intelligent, thorough, and necessary reflection. The focus on the activity of communicating as opposed to what is being communicated holds great promise. Such a move opens up a perspective where obligations do not attach a priori to certain kinds of information, but to the manner in which actual engagement with such information occurs. This begins to get at a complexity, in the area of informed consent, that has been missed.' Mark Sheldon, Professor of Philosophy, Northwestern University

You may also be interested in...

Dirty Electricity
Added to basket
Call the Doctor
Added to basket
Where Does it Hurt?
Added to basket
Medical Ethics: A Very Short Introduction
Added to basket
Oxford Handbook for the Foundation Programme
Added to basket
Macleod's Clinical Examination
Added to basket
Avoiding Errors in General Practice
Added to basket
Intelligent Kindness
Added to basket
Great Debates in Medical Law and Ethics
Added to basket
Human Factors in Healthcare
Added to basket
Principles of Biomedical Ethics
Added to basket
Proper Doctoring
Added to basket
A Question of Trust
Added to basket


Please sign in to write a review

Your review has been submitted successfully.