• Sign In
  • Help
  • My Basket0
The books you love, the emails you want
Opt in by 25 May or you'll stop hearing from us
REVIEW NOW
Reconcilable Differences?: Congress, the Budget Process, and the Deficit (Paperback)
  • Reconcilable Differences?: Congress, the Budget Process, and the Deficit (Paperback)
zoom

Reconcilable Differences?: Congress, the Budget Process, and the Deficit (Paperback)

(author)
£23.95
Paperback 272 Pages / Published: 01/07/1992
  • Not available

This product is currently unavailable.

  • This item has been added to your basket

Check Marketplace availability

Gilmour traces the development of the congressional budget process from its origin through the emergence of reconcilliation and Gramm-Rudman-Hollings. He shows how changes in process have brought about far-reaching shifts in congressional power, and explains why they have failed to control the explosion of budget deficits. Throughout the last decade budgetary issues have dominated the national political agenda as the deficit has skyrocketed to previously unimaginable levels. In this important book, John Gilmour traces the continuing quest of Congress over the last fifteen years to reform its budgeting system in the hope of producing better policy. He shows that the enactment of the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 and the introduction of the reconciliation procedure in 1980 have produced a budgetary system in which congressional majorities can get what they want, provided only that they can agree on a comprehensive budget policy. From his thorough analysis, Gilmour concludes that, while the reforms have not produced balanced budgets, they have eliminated procedural obstructions to the adoption of a coherent budget. New budget procedures have transformed the way Congress works. Before the reforms of 1974 and 1980, Congress had an extremely fragmented, disintegrated budgetary system in which the budget emerged almost haphazardly from the independent actions of numerous committees. Gilmour shows that reconciliation procedures in the budget process makes total revenue, total expenditures, and the size of the deficit matters of deliberate choice, consolidating decisionmaking to an extent unprecedented in the history of the modern Congress. Yet, despite the striking structural and procedural changes, and despite its highly majoritarian features, the budget process has failed to reduce dissatisfaction with congressional handling of money. Deficits have been larger, not smaller, and overall spending has gone up. Gilmour deftly shows that the massive budget deficits of the Reagan years were due primarily to the failure of the House, the Senate, and the President to agree on how to reduce spending or increase taxes enough to eliminate the deficit. Responsibility for budgetary failure, he argues, must rest with Congress and its inability to reach consensus, not on the new budget process, which, given what we can expect from procedural change, has been quite successful.

Publisher: University of California Press
ISBN: 9780520069435
Number of pages: 272
Weight: 499 g
Dimensions: 229 x 152 x 20 mm

You may also be interested in...

Hard Choices
Added to basket
Even Silence Has An End
Added to basket
Austerity
Added to basket
£10.99
Paperback
House of Debt
Added to basket
£11.50
Paperback
The Irish War
Added to basket
£9.99
Paperback
The Fire Engine That Disappeared
Added to basket
How to be a Minister
Added to basket
Breadline Britain
Added to basket
The Commons and Lords
Added to basket
The Rise and Fall of the Great Powers
Added to basket
How to be an MP
Added to basket
£12.99
Paperback
The New Machiavelli
Added to basket
How Much is Enough?
Added to basket
Coming Up Trumps: A Memoir
Added to basket

Reviews

Please sign in to write a review

Your review has been submitted successfully.