Race and Redistricting: The Shaw-Cromartie Cases - Landmark Law Cases and American Society (Hardback)
  • Race and Redistricting: The Shaw-Cromartie Cases - Landmark Law Cases and American Society (Hardback)
zoom

Race and Redistricting: The Shaw-Cromartie Cases - Landmark Law Cases and American Society (Hardback)

(author)
£37.95
Hardback 176 Pages / Published: 31/10/2002
  • We can order this

Usually dispatched within 3 weeks

  • This item has been added to your basket
Through much of the 1990s, a newly hatched snake wreaked political havoc in the South.

When North Carolina gained a seat in Congress following the 1990 census, it sought to rectify a long-standing failure to represent African American voters by creating, under federal pressure, two "majority-minority" voting districts. One of these snaked along Interstate 85 for nearly two hundred miles--not much wider than the road itself in some places--and was ridiculed by many as one of the least compact legislative districts ever proposed.

From 1993 to 2001, three intertwined cases went before the Supreme Court that decided how far a state could go in establishing voting districts along racial lines. Noted Supreme Court biographer Tinsley Yarbrough examines these closely linked landmark cases to show how the Court addressed the constitutionality of redistricting within the volatile contexts of civil rights and partisan politics.

A suit was first filed by Duke University law professor Robinson Everett, a liberal who loathed discrimination but considered racially motivated redistricting a clear violation of the Fourteenth Amendment's equal protection clause. Yarbrough tells how Everett enlisted associates as plaintiffs and went on to win two Supreme Court victories in Shaw v. Reno (1993) and Shaw v. Hunt (1996)--both by 5-4 decisions. Following the creation of another "flawed" redistricting plan, he rounded up a new set of plaintiffs to take the battle back to the Supreme Court. But this time, in Easley v. Cromartie--on the swing vote of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor--the 5-4 vote went against him.

Yarbrough shows the significant impact these cases have had on election law and the fascinating interplay of law, politics, and human conflict that the dispute generated. Drawing heavily on court records and on interviews with attorneys on both sides of the litigation, he relates a complex and intriguing tale about these protracted struggles. His cogent and balanced analysis considers whether the state legislature was wrong in using race as a measure for establishing the new district, or whether it was simply engaging in the time-honored practice of gerrymandering to ensure political balance.

Race and Redistricting spotlights efforts to "racially engineer" voting districts in an effort to achieve fair representation. By examining one state's efforts to confront such dilemmas, it helps readers better understand future disputes over race and politics, as well as the ongoing debates over our "color-blind" constitution.

Publisher: University Press of Kansas
ISBN: 9780700612185
Number of pages: 176
Weight: 440 g
Dimensions: 216 x 140 x 24 mm

You may also be interested in...

I Let Him Go
Added to basket
£8.99   £6.99
Paperback
Constitutional Law
Added to basket
£82.00
Paperback
OCR AS/A Level Law Book 1
Added to basket
The Daily Telegraph Tax Guide 2018
Added to basket
East West Street
Added to basket
£9.99
Paperback
The Secret Barrister
Added to basket
£16.99   £13.99
Hardback
AQA A-level Law for Year 1/AS
Added to basket
The Ten Types of Human
Added to basket
£9.99   £7.99
Paperback
Eve Was Shamed
Added to basket
£20.00
Hardback
Letters to a Law Student
Added to basket
The Greatest
Added to basket
£9.99
Paperback
Democracy Hacked
Added to basket
£16.99
Hardback
Life in the UK Test: Study Guide & CD ROM 2018
Added to basket
Work Like a Woman
Added to basket
£12.99
Hardback

Reviews

Please sign in to write a review

Your review has been submitted successfully.