Levels of Argument: A Comparative Study of Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics (Paperback)
  • Levels of Argument: A Comparative Study of Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics (Paperback)
zoom

Levels of Argument: A Comparative Study of Plato's Republic and Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics (Paperback)

(author)
£18.99
Paperback 256 Pages / Published: 29/03/2018
  • In stock online

Usually dispatched within 24 hours

  • This item has been added to your basket
Your local Waterstones may have stock of this item. Please check by using Click & Collect
In Levels of Argument, Dominic Scott compares the Republic and Nicomachean Ethics from a methodological perspective. In the first half he argues that the Republic distinguishes between two levels of argument in the defence of justice, the 'longer' and 'shorter' routes. The longer is the ideal and aims at maximum precision, requiring knowledge of the Forms and a definition of the Good. The shorter route is less precise, employing hypotheses, analogies and empirical observation. This is the route that Socrates actually follows in the Republic, because it is appropriate to the level of his audience and can stand on its own feet as a plausible defence of justice. In the second half of the book, Scott turns to the Nicomachean Ethics. Scott argues that, even though Aristotle rejects a universal Form of the Good, he implicitly recognises the existence of longer and shorter routes, analogous to those distinguished in the Republic. The longer route would require a comprehensive theoretical worldview, incorporating elements from Aristotle's metaphysics, physics, psychology, and biology. But Aristotle steers his audience away from such an approach as being a distraction from the essentially practical goals of political science. Unnecessary for good decision-making, it is not even an ideal. In sum, Platonic and Aristotelian methodologies both converge and diverge. Both distinguish analogously similar levels of argument, and it is the shorter route that both philosophers actually follow-Plato because he thinks it will have to suffice, Aristotle because he thinks that there is no need to go beyond it.

Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISBN: 9780198801610
Number of pages: 256
Weight: 316 g
Dimensions: 216 x 141 x 14 mm

You may also be interested in...

How To Think
Added to basket
£7.99   £5.99
Paperback
The Myth of Sisyphus
Added to basket
The Little Book of Ikigai
Added to basket
12 Rules for Life
Added to basket
£20.00   £16.00
Hardback
How the World Thinks
Added to basket
£20.00   £18.00
Hardback
Meditations
Added to basket
£7.99   £5.99
Paperback
Ikigai
Added to basket
£12.99   £9.99
Hardback
The Republic
Added to basket
£8.99   £6.99
Paperback
Wabi Sabi
Added to basket
£12.99
Hardback
The Order of Time
Added to basket
£12.99
Hardback
Happy
Added to basket
£8.99
Paperback
National Populism
Added to basket
£9.99
Paperback
I Am Dynamite!
Added to basket
£25.00
Hardback
The Prince
Added to basket
£7.99   £5.99
Paperback
Enlightenment Now
Added to basket
£12.99
Paperback

Reviews

Please sign in to write a review

Your review has been submitted successfully.