I'm Sorry for What I've Done: The Language of Courtroom Apologies - Oxford Studies in Language and Law (Hardback)
  • I'm Sorry for What I've Done: The Language of Courtroom Apologies - Oxford Studies in Language and Law (Hardback)
zoom

I'm Sorry for What I've Done: The Language of Courtroom Apologies - Oxford Studies in Language and Law (Hardback)

(author)
£72.00
Hardback 256 Pages / Published: 29/05/2014
  • We can order this from the publisher

UK delivery within 3-4 weeks

  • This item has been added to your basket
This book examines 52 apologetic allocutions produced during federal sentencing hearings. The practice of inviting defendants to make a statement in their own behalf is a long-standing one and it is understood as offering defendants the opportunity to impress a judge or jury with their remorse, which could be a factor in the sentence that is imposed. Defendants raised the topics of the offense, mitigation, future behaviour and the sentence in different ways and this book explores the pros and cons associated with the different strategies that they used. Because there is no way of ascertaining exactly how effective (or ineffective) an individual allocution is, case law, sociolinguistic and historical resources, and judges' final remarks are used to develop hypotheses about defendants' communicative goals as well as what might constitute an ideal defendant stance from a judge's point of view. The corpus is unique because, unlike official transcripts, the transcripts used for this study include paralinguistic features such as hesitations, wavering voice, and crying-while-talking. Among its highlights, the book proposes that although a ritualized apology formula (e.g., "I'm sorry " or "I apologize ") would appear to be a good fit for the context of allocution and even appears to be expected, the use of these formulas carries implications in this context that do not serve defendants' communicative goals. I argue that the application of Austin's (1962) performative-constative continuum reveals that offense-related utterances that fall closer to the constative end are more consistent with the discursive constraints on the speech event of allocution. Further, I propose that the ideologies associated with allocution, in particular the belief that allocution functions as a protection for defendants, obscures the ways in which the context constrains what defendants can say and how effectively they can say it.

Publisher: Oxford University Press Inc
ISBN: 9780199325665
Number of pages: 256
Weight: 462 g
Dimensions: 241 x 162 x 25 mm


MEDIA REVIEWS
I'm Sorry For What I Have Done is accessible at all levels ... an exceedingly interesting read. * Sarah Morley, LSE USAPP *
I have no hesitation in recommending it to any student of language. * Joe Sinclair, New Nuturing Potential *
invaluable resource for students, teachers and researchers in the domains of linguistics and law * Guofeng Wang, Discourse Studies *

You may also be interested in...

The Language Lover's Puzzle Book
Added to basket
How Words Get Good
Added to basket
£14.99
Hardback
The Owl and the Nightingale
Added to basket
The Will to Power
Added to basket
The Language Game
Added to basket
The Fairy Tellers
Added to basket
Red Herrings And White Elephants
Added to basket
How to Argue with a Cat
Added to basket
Oxford Dictionary of Idioms
Added to basket
The Arctic
Added to basket
£14.99
Hardback
Let's Sign Pocket Dictionary
Added to basket
The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows
Added to basket
The Art of Disagreeing Well
Added to basket
Mythologies
Added to basket
£9.99
Paperback
Kingdom of Characters
Added to basket
£20.00
Hardback

Please sign in to write a review

Your review has been submitted successfully.