From Ballot to Bench: Judicial Elections and the Quest for Accountability (Paperback)
  • From Ballot to Bench: Judicial Elections and the Quest for Accountability (Paperback)
zoom

From Ballot to Bench: Judicial Elections and the Quest for Accountability (Paperback)

(author)
£26.99
Paperback 332 Pages / Published: 01/10/2014
  • Publisher out of stock

Currently unavailable to order

This product is currently unavailable.

  • This item has been added to your basket

Over several decades, many U.S. states abandoned the practice of selecting their judges by direct popular election and adopted the Missouri Plan of judicial selection. In From Ballot to Bench, Philip L. Dubois subjects the various criticisms raised against judicial elections to a more searching scrutiny than previously has been attempted.

Dubois carefully reviews the three central counts on which judicial elections have been faulted: for lowering the quality of the bench, for impairing judicial independence, and for failing to secure judicial accountability. After concluding that the potential for judicial elections to hold judges popularly accountable is what might commend them over alternative selection methods, Dubois concentrates on the analysis of empirical evidence to evaluate judicial elections as mechanisms of accountability.

The study examines all the statewide partisan and nonpartisan elections for state supreme court justices in non-southern states from 1948 to 1974. Included is a detailed examination of voter participation, electoral competition, the behavior of judicial electorates, and the patterns of gubernatorial vacancy appointments. An analysis of decision making on eight state supreme courts also tests the relationship between different selection systems and judicial behavior.

Dubois finds that partisan elections maximize voter participation, meaningfully structure voter choices, minimize accession to the bench by appointment, and allow popular control over gubernatorial appointments. Additional evidence on the extent of partisan voting by judges selected under different methods leads Dubois to conclude that partisan elections are superior to both nonpartisan elections and nonelective selection methods as instruments of accountability.

The importance of the questions addressed, the breadth of the data collected, and the unorthodox conclusions offered make this a significant book for political scientists, judges, lawyers, and public officials.

Publisher: University of Texas Press
ISBN: 9780292768666
Number of pages: 332
Weight: 726 g
Dimensions: 229 x 152 x 19 mm

You may also be interested in...

The Irish Voter
Added to basket
£17.99
Paperback
The Scottish Suffragettes
Added to basket
How to Win an Election
Added to basket
5 Days in May
Added to basket
£12.99
Hardback
The Democratic Unionist Party
Added to basket
Race of a Lifetime
Added to basket
Rebel Girls
Added to basket
£14.99
Paperback
A Song of their Own
Added to basket
£12.99
Paperback
Economics and Elections
Added to basket
Adams vs. Jefferson
Added to basket
£14.99
Paperback
The Modi Effect
Added to basket
£14.99
Paperback
Hacking the Electorate
Added to basket
Elections and Voters in Britain
Added to basket
UKIP
Added to basket
£18.99
Hardback

Please sign in to write a review

Your review has been submitted successfully.