Conventional Wisdom, Parties, and Broken Barriers in the 2016 Election (Paperback)Jennifer C. Lucas (editor), Christopher J. Galdieri (editor), Tauna Starbuck Sisco (editor), Mark D. Brewer (author of contributions), Richard Powell (author of contributions), Chad Kinsella (author of contributions), Kevin J. McMahon (author of contributions), Atiya Kai Stokes-Brown (author of contributions), Matthew D. Atkinson (author of contributions), Julia R. Azari (author of contributions)
- Not available
In this volume, political scientists examine previous theories and trends in light of the 2016 election to determine the extent to which 2016 was a break from previous theories. While in some areas it seems as though 2016 was really just what would have been predicted, in others, this election and the new president pose significant challenges to mainstream theories in political science. In particular, prominent political scientists examine whether voter trends, with particular focus on groups by gender, age, geography, and ethnicity, and election issues, especially the role of the Supreme Court, followed or bucked recent trends. Several political scientists examine the unconventional nomination process and whether this signals a new era for political parties. The role of conspiracy theories and voter confidence in the administration of elections are also discussed. Finally, contributors also examine the indirect effect the presidential candidates, especially Trump, played in congressional election rhetoric.
Publisher: Lexington Books
Number of pages: 272
Weight: 417 g
Dimensions: 223 x 152 x 20 mm
Summing Up: Recommended. Upper-division undergraduates through faculty. * CHOICE *
The 2016 contest produced more than the usual number of surprises while also advancing larger trends in partisan, electoral, ethnic, and gender politics. In this book, an expert team of scholars sifts through the evidence to tell us what changed and what didn't -placing the events of 2016 in welcome theoretical and historical context while authoritatively addressing the many new questions that have emerged in the wake of such a historic election. -- David Hopkins, Boston College
The 2016 election cycle challenged much of the conventional wisdom in American politics. The role of political parties, endorsements, fundraising, gender norms, ideology, policy issues, party elites, and rank and file voters, all seemingly changed context during this contentious campaign. A great group of authors explore the impact that the Trump and Clinton campaigns had on the national congressional contests and whether 2016 will mark a major turning point in American elections or it was an exception that helped to prove the rule. These political scientists examine previous theories and trends in light of the 2016 election outcomes to determine the extent to which the unconventional campaign undermined or supported those theories. While in some areas it seems as though 2016 was really just what would have been predicted, in others, this election and the style of the new president pose significant challenges to mainstream theories in political science. How did Trump's plain spoken, outsider political message effect down ballot races? Did past or present Clinton scandals influence voters? How did the Supreme Court vacancy impact Senate races? What role did gender norms and values play in voter's decisions? This volume aims to answer the above questions and more, and put political science conventional wisdom to the test. -- Sean D. Foreman, Barry University
You may also be interested in...
Would you like to proceed to the App store to download the Waterstones App?