Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution - The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Paperback)
  • Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution - The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Paperback)
zoom

Citizens Divided: Campaign Finance Reform and the Constitution - The Tanner Lectures on Human Values (Paperback)

(author), (author of contributions), (author of contributions), (author of contributions), (author of contributions)
£26.95
Paperback Published: 17/10/2016
  • We can order this from the publisher

UK delivery within 4-5 weeks

  • This item has been added to your basket

The Supreme Court’s 5–4 decision in Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission, which struck down a federal prohibition on independent corporate campaign expenditures, is one of the most controversial opinions in recent memory. Defenders of the First Amendment greeted the ruling with enthusiasm, while advocates of electoral reform recoiled in disbelief. Robert C. Post offers a new constitutional theory that seeks to reconcile these sharply divided camps.

Post interprets constitutional conflict over campaign finance reform as an argument between those who believe self-government requires democratic participation in the formation of public opinion and those who believe that self-government requires a functioning system of representation. The former emphasize the value of free speech, while the latter emphasize the integrity of the electoral process. Each position has deep roots in American constitutional history. Post argues that both positions aim to nurture self-government, which in contemporary life can flourish only if elections are structured to create public confidence that elected officials are attentive to public opinion. Post spells out the many implications of this simple but profound insight. Critiquing the First Amendment reasoning of the Court in Citizens United, he also shows that the Court did not clearly grasp the constitutional dimensions of corporate speech.

Blending history, constitutional law, and political theory, Citizens Divided explains how a Supreme Court case of far-reaching consequence might have been decided differently, in a manner that would have preserved both First Amendment rights and electoral integrity.

Publisher: Harvard University Press
ISBN: 9780674970939


MEDIA REVIEWS

Democracy is not just a structure of elections and political institutions, but a mysterious and historically fluid set of ideas about the relationship between citizens and those who govern. With his characteristically subtle understanding of our cultural history, Robert Post shows how changing ideas of self-government illuminate one of the great political and legal controversies of our time. - Richard H. Pildes, New York University

Robert Post offers a powerful critique of the Citizens United decision, and an original and compelling new perspective on how the Supreme Court should analyze campaign finance laws in light of the First Amendment’s commitment to electoral integrity. - Geoffrey R. Stone, University of Chicago

You may also be interested in...

The Politics Book
Added to basket
DK
£19.99
Hardback
Leviathan
Added to basket
£10.99
Paperback
The Prince
Added to basket
£12.99
Hardback
The Politics
Added to basket
£9.99
Paperback
Republic
Added to basket
£10.99
Paperback
A Discourse on Inequality
Added to basket
The Portable Hannah Arendt
Added to basket
The Prince
Added to basket
£7.99
Paperback
The Social Contract
Added to basket
The Prince: The Original Classic
Added to basket
Utopia
Added to basket
£8.99
Paperback
The Politics
Added to basket
£9.99
Paperback
Common Sense
Added to basket
£5.99
Paperback
On Liberty
Added to basket
£6.99
Paperback

Please sign in to write a review

Your review has been submitted successfully.

env: aptum
branch: