Blog

Hallie Rubenhold on her Battle with the Ripperologists

Posted on 3rd February 2020 by Mark Skinner

The Five, Hallie Rubenhold's magisterial revisionist history of the victims of Jack the Ripper, has received both critical plaudits - scooping the Baillie Gifford Prize for Non-Fiction last November - and popular success. But there has been one section of the public that has always been implacably opposed to Rubenhold's argument: those men who pride themselves on their Ripper expertise, otherwise known as the Ripperologists. In this exclusive essay, Hallie Rubenhold details the abuse and invective she has suffered at the hands of these people and tries to deconstruct why their hatred has been so marked.   

Authors never know how the world will receive their books. There is always an agonising period shortly after the new work appears on the shelves when we await with bated breath, and not a little dread, the verdict of the critics. Until recently, none of my books – two novels and two works of non-fiction – had been deemed especially controversial. They were born, introduced to the public, read, discussed, and, for the most part, readers were kind to them. Then there came The Five.

I can’t say that I didn’t expect some dissent when I decided to tackle a subject with a connection to Jack the Ripper. However, I hadn’t anticipated just how much fury The Five would ignite, nor how early it would begin.

From the outset, a number of so-called Ripperologists took offence at the book’s claims that it was the first full-length biography to examine the five canonical victims as a subject divorced from the story of their killer. Apart from a small booklet containing fifty-seven pages of text, nothing else on the subject existed, but somehow, I’d already got off on the wrong foot. Bit by bit, as we inched nearer to publication day, matters began to escalate. In the summer of 2018, I was hounded on social media for claiming I had discovered that there was no evidence to support the popular belief that Jack the Ripper was a killer of ‘prostitutes.’ I was told by Ripperologists that I should ‘behave professionally’ and ‘stop airing [my] opinions as fact’ before my book came out and my ‘evidence’ could ‘be assessed’ by them. Then it got worse. Photographs of me taken surreptitiously while I was giving a lecture appeared on a Ripperology Facebook page, along with encouragements to post disparaging and sexual commentary. A thread appeared on a forum site I belonged to which ripped me and my yet-unpublished book apart in the most personal and grotesque way. It is now over three hundred pages long.

When The Five was finally published, things exploded. I received abusive messages, I was denounced as a liar and accused of hiding and ignoring ‘facts’, as well as doctoring and redacting documents. One man, who shall always be remembered by the hashtag #ReadthebookTrevor, trolled me incessantly over the course of forty-eight hours. Unfortunately for him, his sexist rant coincided with International Women’s Day, and was not embraced warmly in the Twittersphere. While it was encouraging to feel championed by the public, the invective kept flowing. Perhaps the lowest point was the two-hour podcast recorded by a group of Ripperologists who tore apart The Five chapter by chapter, before finally comparing me to the Holocaust denier David Irving.

What on earth was it about Jack the Ripper that got people so hot and bothered?

Over the months, I’ve been forced to ponder this ridiculous question and it took me some time to make sense of it. I realize now that by writing a book about Polly Nichols, Annie Chapman, Elizabeth Stride, Kate Eddowes and Mary Jane Kelly which had nothing to do with their killer, I had completely disrupted the Ripper narrative. This narrative means a great deal to many people. Some have invested decades of their lives in trying to identify the killer, others have built an identity for themselves around being a Ripperologist. Not only am I an outsider (and a woman), but fundamentally, The Five challenges the very validity of the pursuit of Ripperology.

Ripperology likes to deal in what it cites as ‘facts’, but in researching The Five, I soon learned that these ‘facts’ are derived from a deeply problematic body of evidence. The witness statements, which supposedly document the final movements of the victims, are, with few exceptions, all unverifiable. In the introduction to The Five, I clearly explain that I have excluded statements from witnesses who never knew the victims personally, who could not vouch for their identity. So much of what is reported came from those who believed they had seen one of the victims down a dark street, or possibly heard something said in passing. Not only can none of this be confirmed, but research over the past 131 years has radically changed what we know about the perceptions of witnesses. We’ve learned a great deal about how psychology and environmental factors alter perceptions. We simply can’t lay aside advances in our scientific knowledge when dealing with material from 1888.

‘Facts’ are also not what appear in the era’s newspapers. The witness statements on which much of Ripperology relies do not come from actual documents, but newspaper reports. In many cases, there is no definitive source for what was said, and if something was said it was reprinted in multiple different and contradictory ways. Neither can ‘facts’ consist of hastily scribbled or summarised police notes, steeped in the era’s prejudice. 

All documents require interrogation. In writing a history, my duty was to sift through what had been considered evidence by other authors, weigh its merits and examine its contexts. I learned that there simply is not enough viable evidence in existence to draw any conclusions about the identity of the killer, nor will there ever be. Jack the Ripper’s identity is irrelevant, and for some people that ‘fact’ is just too disturbing.

Comments

Gary Barnett

Almost a year since my last effort. In the interim HR has not eased up on her Ripperologist-bashing.

As I’ve said before, if you want to get the measure of the author you should make a note of the quote below and then take a look at the lengthy bibliography in The Five. Its a veritable Who’s Who? Of Ripperology.

“ Apart from a small booklet containing fifty-seven pages of text, nothing else on the subject existed...”

View more

Gary Barnett
26th February 2021
Helpful? Upvote 0

New reply

Please sign in to respond to comments.
Gary Barnett

Apologies for the sheer number of small posts I have made here to counter HR’s 878-word character assassination of Ripperologists. That was made necessary by Waterstone’s policy of blocking anything longer.

Those who consider my response excessive should bear in mind that this totally misleading denunciation of hundreds of men and women is just one of dozens of similar tirades launched by HR in a variety of media outlets across the globe. My poor little response is a drop in the ocean by comparison.

Stay safe.
View more

Gary Barnett
2nd April 2020
Helpful? Upvote 0

New reply

Please sign in to respond to comments.
Gary Barnett

On one occasion Hallie Tweeted:

“I've just been informed that 'everything there is to know about Jack the Ripper's victims has already been uncovered’. “

I believe that was in response to someone pointing out that most of what IS known about the victims had been discovered and published by Ripperologists. Not that everything that could be found had already been found.

Surely even the most devoted HR fan can see the difference.
View more

Gary Barnett
1st April 2020
Helpful? Upvote 0

New reply

Please sign in to respond to comments.
Gary Barnett

When the author of The Five was herself a Ripperologist named ‘Madam Detective’ she started a thread on the Casebook website with the question:

“How are we so certain the victims were all prostitutes?”

The response she received was:

“We aren’t”.
View more

Gary Barnett
28th March 2020
Helpful? Upvote 0

New reply

Please sign in to respond to comments.
Gary Barnett

Incidentally, there is very little about the ID of the killer in the Ripperologist magazine.

There’s a transcript of the discussion about The Five, an article about the ‘flu epidemic of 1892 and another about Eliza Ross, the female ‘Burker’. And much else besides.

If you read it, I doubt you’ll still believe that ‘Ripperlogists’ are obsessed with the killer.

HR cites it in her bibliography.



View more

Gary Barnett
25th March 2020
Helpful? Upvote 0

New reply

Please sign in to respond to comments.
Gary Barnett

The truth of the claim that HR was compared to David Irving is available in the latest (free) issue of Ripperologist magazine.


View more

Gary Barnett
25th March 2020
Helpful? Upvote 0

New reply

Please sign in to respond to comments.
Gary Barnett

This is from the Daily Mail (the previous headline was from the Guardian).

‘Waterstones staff claim they are being 'held hostage' after bosses 'force them to take time off as HOLIDAY' if they self-isolate at home due to coronavirus.’

Can that really have been true?



View more

Gary Barnett
22nd March 2020
Helpful? Upvote 1

New reply

Please sign in to respond to comments.
Gary Barnett

Waterstones staff say their health is at risk as stores stay open
Bookshop workers say sanitiser not provided and they are discouraged from wearing gloves View more

Gary Barnett
22nd March 2020
Helpful? Upvote 1

New reply

Please sign in to respond to comments.
Maybea X-Ripperologist

I, for one, have felt the sting of Ms Rubenhold’s and her follower’s admonishment, and have decided to quit Ripperology. I encourage others like me to do the same View more

Maybea X-Ripperologist
15th March 2020
Helpful? Upvote 0
Gary Barnett

But why, Maybea? I'm currently researching an East End woman named Bridget Enright via the JTRForums site. Should I stop because of the false accusations above?

Gary Barnett
15th March 2020
Helpful? Upvote 1
Maybea X-Ripperologist

The accusations are false for some, Gary, but not all, so I'm not suggesting you or persons like you stop. Let's face it. Ripperology attracts all kinds, even the ones Hallie's talking about. What percentage, I don't know. I'm presently researching the Isdal Woman. I think she's a suicide so it's safer from any kind of accusations.

Maybea X-Ripperologist
27th April 2020
Helpful? Upvote 0

New reply

Please sign in to respond to comments.
Gary Barnett


The most ironic thing about all of this is that it isn’t ‘Ripperologists’ who are wedded to a particular view of the victims and are angrily resisting any contrary opinions, it’s HR who has come up with a rather daft revisionist theory and is vilifying anyone who points out it’s obvious flaws. View more

Gary Barnett
3rd March 2020
Helpful? Upvote 1

New reply

Please sign in to respond to comments.