• Sign In / Register
  • Help
  • Basket0

Blog

An Exclusive Introduction to George Saunders' Viral Lecture Hit, Congratulations, by the way

Posted on 18th October 2017 by Sally Campbell
George Saunders is a writer’s writer. As a short-story author, he has hoovered up a number of awards, including the Man Booker Prize 2017, O. Henry, the World Fantasy Award, the Folio Prize, a Guggenheim Fellowship and an Arts and Letters Award from the American Academy of Arts and Letters. Word of Saunders’ shift to the novel has provoked a rare flurry of anticipation, and the result – a wild flight from fact to fantasy where Abraham Lincoln is forced to fight for his dead son’s soul – has had everyone (from Zadie Smith to Thomas Pynchon) referring to Lincoln in the Bardo as a slice of pure, unadulterated genius.

In 2013, a convocation speech George Saunders gave for Syracuse University’s College of Arts and Sciences was later posted to the website of the New York Times and became an extraordinary viral hit. Congratulations, by the way has later found print as a beautifully produced hardback and it’s our pleasure to be able to reproduce that speech here, together with a new foreword and afterword, written exclusively for Waterstones.

Photo: George Saunders (c) Chloe Aftel
 

Foreword

 

A few years ago I was asked to give the convocation speech for Syracuse University’s College of Arts and Sciences, in the Carrier Dome, a gigantic on-campus sports venue that, like an island nation, suffers extreme and inexplicable variations in temperature, and is also legendarily echo-prone.  The audience would be comprised of all ages and attention-spans, everyone there under compunction, i.e., not game for a lengthy oration.  I decided to write it to speak, as it were: light, conversational, allusive, earnest.  I started by asking myself, as frankly as possible, “What, if anything, do I know, that these bright, lucky, well-educated kids don’t?”  And the honest answer was: “Not much, actually, except that, because I’m old, I’ve been around long enough to have a better handle on the end-game, as judged by that most heartless barometer, regret.” 

It was a ten-minute talk that, at the time, seemed to leave very little positive impression.  I remember fixating on a couple of young men in the crowd who had dozed off.  Afterwards I wandered through the reception, pathetically fishing for compliments that were not forthcoming.  I thought, “Well, at least that’s done, and now I can go have my summer.” 

Joel Lovell, an editor at The New York Times Magazine, posted a copy on the magazine’s website.  In July, while my family and I were in South Dakota on vacation, the speech went viral, getting over a million hits.  This led to the publication of a small book (“Congratulations, By the Way,”) containing the text of the speech, as follows.

  

Congratulations, by the way

Down through the ages, a traditional form has evolved for this type of speech, which is: Some old fart, his best years behind him, who, over the course of his life has made a series of dreadful mistakes (that would be me), gives heartfelt advice to a group of shining, energetic young people, with all of their best years ahead of them (that would be you).

And I intend to respect that tradition.

Now, one useful thing you can do with old people, in addition to borrowing money from them or getting them to do one of their old-time “dances,” so you can watch while laughing, is ask, “Looking back, what do you regret?” And they’ll tell you. Sometimes, as you know, they’ll tell you even if you haven’t asked. Sometimes, even when you’ve specifically requested that they not tell you, theyll tell you. So: What do I regret? Being poor  from time to time? Not really. Working terrible jobs, like “knuckle-puller in a slaughterhouse”? (And don’t even ask  what that entails.) No. I don’t regret that.

Skinny-dipping in a river in Sumatra, a little buzzed, and  looking  up and seeing like three hundred monkeys sitting on a pipeline, pooping down  into the river, the river in which I was swimming, with my mouth open, naked? And getting deathly ill afterward, and  staying sick for the next seven months? Honestly, no. Do I regret the occasional humiliation? Like once, playing hockey in front of a big crowd,  including this  girl I really liked, I somehow managed, while falling and emitting this weird whooping noise, to score on my own goalie, while also  sending my stick flying into the crowd, nearly hitting that girl. NoI don’t even regret that.

But here’s something I do regret:

In seventh grade, this new kid joined our class. In the interest of confidentiality, her Convocation Speech name will be “ELLEN.” ELLEN was small, shy. She wore these blue cat’s-eye glasses that, at the time, only old ladies wore. When nervous, which was pretty much always, she had a habit of taking a strand of hair into her mouth and chewing on it.

So she came to our school and our neighborhood, and was mostly ignored, occasionally teased. (“Your hair taste good?” — that sort of thing). I could see this hurt her. I still remember the way she’d look after such an insult: eyes cast down, a little gut-kicked, as if, having just been reminded of her place in things, she was trying, as much as possible, to disappear. After awhile she’d drift away, hair-strand still in her mouth. At home, I imagined, after school, her mother would say, you know: “How was your day, sweetie?” and she’d say, “Oh, fine.” And her mother would say, “Making any friends?” and she’d go, “Sure, lots.”

Sometimes I’d see her hanging around alone in her front yard, as if afraid to leave it.

And then — they moved. That was it. No tragedy, no big final hazing.

One day she was there, next day she wasn’t.

End of story.

Now, why do I regret that? Why, forty-two years later, am I still thinking about it? Relative to most of the other kids, I was actually pretty nice to her. I never said an unkind word to her. In fact, I sometimes even (mildly) defended her.

But still. It bothers me.

So here’s something I know to be true, although it’s a little corny, and I don’t quite know what to do with it:

What I regret most in my life are failures of kindness.

Those moments when another human being was there, in front of me, suffering, and I responded . . . sensibly. Reservedly. Mildly.

Or, to look at it from the other end of the telescope: Who, in your life, do you remember most fondly, with the most undeniable feelings of warmth?

Those who were kindest to you, I bet.

It’s a little facile, maybe, and certainly hard to implement, but I’d say, as a goal in life, you could do worse than: Try to be kinder.

Now, the million-dollar question: What’s our problem? Why aren’t we kinder?

Here’s what I think:

Each of us is born with a series of built-in confusions that are probably somehow Darwinian. These are: (1) we’re central to the universe (that is, our personal story is the main and most interesting story, the only story, really); (2) we’re separate from the universe (there’s US and then, out there, all that other junk – dogs and swing-sets, and the State of Nebraska and low-hanging clouds and, you know, other people), and (3) we’re permanent (death is real, okay., sure – for you, but not for me).

Now, we dont really believe these thingsintellectually, we know better—but we believe them viscerally, and  live by them, and  they  cause us to prioritize our own needs over the needs of others, even though what we really want, in our hearts, is to be less selfish, more aware of what’s actually happening in the present moment, more open, and  more loving.

We know we want these things because from time to time we have been these things - and liked it.

So, the second million-dollar question: How might we do this? How might we become more loving, more open, less selfish, more present, less delusional, et cetera, et cetera?

Well, yes, good question.

Unfortunately, I only have three minutes left.

So let me just say this. There are ways. You already know that because, in your life, there have been High Kindness periods and Low Kindness periods, and you know what inclined you toward the former and away from the latter. Its an exciting idea: Since we have observed that kindness is variable, we might also sensibly conclude that it is improvable; that is, there must be approaches and  practices that can actually increase our ambient level of kindness.

Education is good; immersing ourselves in a work of art: good; prayer is good; meditation’s good; a frank talk with a dear friend; establishing ourselves in some kind of spiritual tradition — recognizing that there have been countless really smart people before us who have asked these same questions and left behind answers for us. It would  be strange and  self-defeating to fail to seek out these wise voices from the past— as self-defeating as it would  be to attempt to rediscover the principles of physics from scratch or invent a new method of brain  surgery without having learned the ones that already exist.

Because kindness, it turns out, is hard — it starts out all rainbows and puppy dogs, and expands to include . . . well, everything.

One thing in our favor: Some of this “becoming kinder” happens naturally, with age. It might be a simple matter of attrition: As we get older, we come to see how useless it is to be selfish—how illogical, really. We come to love certain other people and  are thereby counterinstructed in our own centrality. We get our butts kicked by real life, and  people come to our defense, and help us, and  we learn that we’re not separate, and  don’t want to be. We see people near and  dear to us dropping away, and  are gradually convinced that maybe we too will drop  away (someday, a long time from now). Most people, as they age, become less selfish and  more loving. I think this is true. The great Syracuse poet Hayden Carruth said, in a poem written near the end of his life, that he was mostly Love, now.

And so, a prediction, and  my heartfelt wish for you: As you get older, your self will diminish and you will grow in love. YOU will gradually be replaced by LOVE. If you have kids, that will be a huge moment in your process of self- diminishment. You really won’t care what happens to YOU, as long as they benefit. That’s one reason your parents are so proud and  happy today. One of their fondest dreams has come true: You have accomplished something difficult and tangible that has enlarged you as a person and will make your life better, from here on in, forever.

Congratulations, by the way.

When  young,  we’re anxious—understandably— to find out  if we’ve got what it takes. Can  we succeed? Can  we build a viable life for ourselves? But you—in particular you, of this generation— may have noticed a certain cyclical  quality  to ambition. You do well in high school, in the hopes of getting into a good college, so you can do well in the good college, in the hopes of getting a

good job, so you can do well in the good job, so you can...

And this is actually Okay. If we’re going to become kinder, that process has to include taking ourselves seriously — as doers, as accomplishers, as dreamers. We have to do that, to be our best selves.

Still, accomplishment is unreliable. “Succeeding,” whatever that might mean to you, is hard, and the need to do so constantly renews itself (success is like a mountain that keeps growing ahead of you as you hike it), and there’s the very real danger that “succeeding” will take up your whole life, while the big questions go untended.

can  look back and  see that I’ve spent much of my life in a cloud of things that have tended to push “being kind” to the periphery. Things like: Anxiety. Fear. Insecurity. Ambition. The mistaken belief that enough accomplishment will rid me of all that anxiety, fear, insecurity, and  ambition. The belief that if I can only accrue enough— enough accomplishment, money, fame—my neuroses will disappear. I’ve been in this fog certainly since, at least, my own graduation day. Over the years I’ve felt: Kindness, sure—but first let me finish this semester, this degree, this book; let me succeed at this job, and  afford  this house, and  raise these kids, and  then, finally, when all is accomplished, I’ll get started on the kindness. Except it never all gets accomplished. It’s a cycle that can go on . . . well, forever.

So, quick, end-of-speech advice. Since, according to me, your life is going  to be a gradual process of becoming kinder  and  more loving: Hurry up. Speed it along.  Start right now. There’s a confusion in each of us, a sickness, really: selfishness. But there’s also a cure.

Be a good and  proactive and  even somewhat desperate patient on your own behalf—seek out the most efficacious anti-selfishness medicines, energetically, for the rest of your life. Find out what makes you kinder, what opens you up and  brings out  the most loving, generous, and unafraid version of you—and go after those things as if nothing else matters.

Because, actually, nothing else does.

Do all the other things, of course, the ambitious things—travel, get rich, get famous, innovate, lead, fall in love, make and  lose fortunes, swim naked in wild jungle  rivers (aher first having them tested for monkey poop)—but as you do, to the extent that you can, err in the direction of kindness. Do those things that incline  you toward the big questions, and  avoid  the things that would  reduce you and  make you trivial. That luminous part of you that exists beyond personality—your soul, if you will—is as bright and  shining as any that has ever been. Bright as Shakespeare’s, bright as Gandhi’s, bright as Mother Teresas. Clear away everything that keeps you separate from this secret, luminous place. Believe that it exists, come to know it better, nurture it, share its fruits tirelessly.

And someday, in eighty years, when you’re a hundred, and I’m a hundred and thirty-four, and we’re both so kind and loving we’re nearly unbearable, drop me a line, let me know how your life has been. I hope you will say: It has been so wonderful.

I wish you great happiness, all the luck in the world, and a beautiful summer.

 

Afterword 
 

The speech and the associated book led to an evolving and lively discussion of “kindness.” What is it?  Why is it important?  Many people – just about everyone, it turns out – seem to agree that kindness is an important virtue, but many people also seem to understand “kindness” as “that which I am already doing.”  So: a radio phone call from an angry guy in Texas who snarled that “people just don’t get it about kindness.”  Or the woman who agreed wholeheartedly that kindness was an essential virtue – especially to us unfailingly kind Americans, whereas, based on a recent trip she had taken, those Europeans?  Do not get it about kindness.  And so on.  It also became clear that people had a tendency to conflate “kindness” with “niceness.”  While one could do worse than being nice all the time, there are situations where (if we define “being kind” as “benefitting people”) then being kind might actually involve edge, fierceness, even anger.  If someone drives a spike through your head, for example, it is not particularly “kind” to do that palms-together bowing thing while thanking them for providing you with an innovative coat-rack.  That would qualify as “enabling,” or what I’ve heard called “idiot compassion.” 

If we set out every day with the simple goal of “being kind” we will find ourselves running into all kinds of instructive obstacles.  What does kindness look like in the face of abuse?  What is the line between “trying to be kind” and “being over-involved?”  It seems the young barista has been crying – what to do?  Leave her alone? Try to lovingly intervene?  Well, it depends, we might come to understand, on which weeping barista we are talking about, and at what precise moment.  So the desire to “be kinder” naturally expands into a desire to “be more aware,” which, in turn, leads to a consideration of the various mindstates we occupy in a give day.  Which mindstate is most likely to produce truly kind acts?  And how might that mindstate be encouraged in ourselves, and maintained?

These days, Trump in ascendance, these questions feel crazily and freshly alive.  What might kindness look like, on its feet, in a time when a man comes to vast power via systemic unkindness (aggression, insults, targeted belligerence, swaggering self-involvement)?  Is the time for understanding the enemy over?  What happens to the urge to be compassionate when your opponents seem entirely uninterested in understanding you better, bent instead on maligning and frightening entire groups of good people (Muslims, Mexicans, African-Americans, LGBQ people, women)?  What might the civic form of tough-love look like? 

The wild, almost comic, level of incivility here, at rallies and on the Internet, has convinced me anew that the eternal verities – love thy neighbor, try to understand your enemy, be kind – are truer and more necessary than ever, if more complicated than we might have understood in that previous, sloth-inducing, pre-Trump time (i.e., just a few months ago).

The rise of the Trump movement does not, through its success, argue for an end to kindness (or compassion, or precision of speech, or endeavoring to understand and love one another) but it does necessitate an expansion of our understanding of what these virtues look like in actual practice.  “An untested virtue is not a virtue,” said Mark Twain, and, therefore, how lucky are we (ha ha), to find ourselves in a position to refine our notions of kindness, and test that virtue under duress.



   
Lincoln in the Bardo is published on the 9th March 2017.

      

Comments

There are currently no comments.